Am 05.04.2016 23:22, schrieb Guillaume Nault:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:18:14PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 05.04.2016 02:56, schrieb Guillaume Nault:
>>> @@ -1043,12 +1048,39 @@ static int ppp_dev_configure(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
>>> const struct ppp_config *conf)
>>> {
>>> struct ppp *ppp = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> + struct file *file;
>>> int indx;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + if (conf->fd < 0) {
>>> + file = conf->file;
>>> + if (!file) {
>>> + err = -EBADF;
>>> + goto out;
>>
>> why not just return -EBADF;
>>
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + file = fget(conf->fd);
>>> + if (!file) {
>>> + err = -EBADF;
>>> + goto out;
>>
>> why not just return -EBADF;
>>
> Just because the 'out' label is declared anyway and because this
> centralises the return point. But I agree returning -EBADF directly
> could be more readable. I don't have strong opinion.
in this special case i would go for readable. People tend to miss these
if
if
if
constructs.
NTL its up to you.
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
