Re: MTU strategies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yan Seiner <yan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > I have a question on MTU size strategies.

    > I have a router that terminates a VPN.  The router connects via ppp to
    > my ISP.  I have a physical interface, with a virtual interface for
    > pppoe, and a tun interface for the VPN that runs over the pppoe
    > interface.

    > The physical interface (eth0) has a MTU of 1500.

    > The pppoe interface has an MTU of 1492.

    > The vpn interface has an MTU of 1452, a figure I picked somewhat
    > arbitrarily, assuming a 40 byte overhead for the vpn.

    > My question is then for the other interfaces on the router that face
    > the LAN and the DMZ.  Should these be set to 1492 or 1500?

If the VPN won't be involved, then 1492 is the best bet.
PMTU is *supposed* to take care of all of this, but...

    > And my other question is for the DHCP clients.  Should they be set to
    > 1492 (and the one host that uses the VPN should be set to 1452)?

The DHCP client should receive 1492 from the server, and set it on the
interface.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux