> I'm saying to leave the code alone. Do I need to try another interpretation out for your feedback? > If it goes: > > var = foo_that_returns_ptr_err() > if (IS_ERR(var)) > return PTR_ERR(var); > > p->bar = var; > > or whatever, simply keep it that way! Do you want to express here that a data structure member should only be set after a previous function call succeeded? > I'm not engaging in this conversation any further, you have > already consumed way too much of my limited time on this > incredibly trivial matter. I hope that you will find a bit time and patience again to clarify affected implementation details in a safer and unambiguous way. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
