Charlie Brady <charlieb-linux-ppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> RADIUS plugin changes:
> ...
>> 8) if we find an invalid option in radius config file, it is fatal
> This one is stupid. I recently sent you a patch to revert it. pppd
> should not die just because a new option which the radius plugin
> doesn't care about has been added to the radiusclient. Is the radius
> plugin reading the config file to validate it for correctness, or to
> read a few items which it cares about?
Like I said, it might well be that some of the things I saw were not in fact
"features", but regressions. This one also seemed daft to me, and I haven't
yet found reasons for a bunch of other things. I.e. does this fix a real
customer problem?
I think this is an example of this.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
