On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:39 PM, arun b <arun.s.bailur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, James Carlson <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06/02/10 05:26, James Chapman wrote: >>> starts a pppd instance on ATM VPI 0, VCI 80 and assigns IP 192.168.1.1 >>> to the local interface and 192.168.1.2 to the peer when the PPPoA peer >>> connects on VPI 0, VCI 80. If you are building a DSLAM-like box which >>> accepts connections from many PPPoA clients, you will need to start a >>> pppd instance for every possible ATM VPI/VCI that clients might use... >> >> That's one possibility. Another would be having UNI Q.2931 signaling >> set up the virtual circuit for you, and launching pppd based on the >> signaling. >> >> I don't think the existing implementation includes the bits required to >> do that. You'd have to write it yourself. And it (obviously) depends >> on what sort of connection you have to the network. >> >>>> Well I coated this (PADI, PADO,...) because, wanted to know does PPPoA >>>> also follows these message sequence or it has new set of sequence ? >>> >>> No, they are for PPPoE. >> >> The closest equivalent to those messages I can imagine would be the ATM >> signaling mechanism referenced above. >> >> But I think it's probably time to take a step back and ask the obvious >> question: can you tell us what you've got (in terms of hardware, >> software, and operational environment) and what you're trying to do (in >> as much high-level detail as possible)? >> >> -- >> James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > NO I am not building it for Dslam-box. well I want to run PPPoA server > at remote side device where ATM path terminates. > I am executing this is "pppd plugin pppoatm.so 0.80 > 192.168.1.1:192.168.1.2 passive" on my client(linux-box). > > Just trying to put the diagram to make it clear. (Soory for not clean > diagram -:) ) > ------------------ > | | > | | > | PPPoA | > | CLIENT | > | | > ------------------ > |-| RJ-11 connector "pppd plugin pppoatm.so 0.80 > 192.168.1.1:192.168.1.2 passive" > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > |-| RJ-11 connector ?????????????? > --------------------- > | | > | | > | PPPoA | > | Serv | > | ????????? | > | | > ---------------------- > > Here the server device and the configuration are unknown to me. Could > you help in choose the server device (Dslam, iSam like..), and > enabling it. > > James, > To your question: > I have MIPS based network device currently with me. And am exploring > all PPPoX-Client(oe/oa/...) configuration. Where I am already able to > test pppoe, pppoeonATm, and wanted start on PPPoS. - so that we can > port this solution to any of the h/w. > Now got stoped at PPPoA !!! > > -Arun > We have DSLAM device for test, now exploring the possbilty of runing pppoA-server.. also in addition to answer for your question... We my to confgiure MLPPP features... -Arun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
