Re: Re: about pppd termination?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Cameron writes:

> That reminds me.  In the pptpconfig GUI we must define a handler for
> SIGINT before starting pppd, because if we don't the SIGINT we send to
> pppd comes back to us because of "kill(0,sig)".  Why is this?  popen is
> used to activate pppd, so that output from pppd is redirected to GUI.

Because pppd does kill_my_pg when it gets a SIGTERM, SIGINT or SIGHUP
even if it hasn't detached, and it probably shouldn't.  Calling
kill_my_pg is the right thing to do if pppd has detached, because then
it has done a setsid.  But if it hasn't detached, then any signal sent
to the process group will get to any connector/disconnector processes
that are running anyway.  There does still remain the question of how
pppd gets any connector/disconnector processes to stop if pppd has to
terminate for other reasons, such as getting a SIGSEGV, though.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux