Re: Re-2: Authentication problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gilles Espinasse writes:
> > So i can't put these options in the config file on the client side? If i
> > understand, he server ask the client for PAP, CHAP or MS-CHAP method to
> > authenticate? The client doesn't choose authentication method? Is it right?
> >
> If one authentication is not configured on the client side, pppd will answer
> with a nak on the request and could offer another authentication method if
> available (that the server may or not accept).

"Configured" in this case means that pppd has access to credentials --
a user name and pass phrase or shared secret for a given
authentication protocol -- and that it's not told _not_ to use them.

On the authenticatee ("client") side, all that you can do is agree to
the peer's request or suggest an alternative; you can't demand to be
identified with a given protocol.

Authentication must work that way.  Allowing the authenticatee to
specify the means of validation is insecure.

On the other side, if you're setting up a "server," you use the
'require-pap' keyword (note that "+pap" is obsolescent) to say that
the peers must use PAP to identify themselves.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux