On 11/07/2013 10:31 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:45 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >> 'powerpc' would be very generic arch and would comprise of all platforms >> including embedded 32/64 bit to server 64 bit (similar to that of ARM). >> This driver does not intend to support complete powerpc arch, but just >> PSERIES and POWERNV platforms termed as 'POWER' processors. So to avoid >> confusion btw 'power mgmt' and 'POWER' archs, I have prefixed both the >> driver and file names with 'IBM'namely ibm-power-driver, cpuidle-ibm-power. > Hi Ben, > Why not book3s ? powerpc-book3s ? I went with 'ibm-power' thinking it would resolve the confusion, but if ppl feel that is is good to get away from 'POWER' and have powerpc-book3s instead to make things clearer, I am open for it. Regards, Deepthi > That's what we use in other places to differenciate between the families > > Ben. > >
