Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:

> > Did this work differently under earlier kernels?
> >
> 
> Unfortunately, s/r did not work for several Linux-Next releases as
> there is missing tglx's patch pendinging in tip.git/timers/core.

Have you tried testing under 3.8?  Or earlier releases?

> > This indicates that the optical mouse didn't survive the suspend/resume
> > sequence and had to be reenumerated.  Without more information, there's
> > no way to tell specifically what went wrong during the initial reset at
> > timestamp 62.353997.
> >
> > If you want to pursue this farther, you could enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG.
> > You could also collect a usbmon trace for bus 1 showing what happens
> > during the suspend and resume.
> >
> 
> Hmm, I can try to enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and build a new kernel.
> 
> Can you give me more hints how to do a usbmon-trace?

See Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt.

> > On the other hand, what difference does it really make if a mouse has
> > to be reenumerated?
> >
> 
> As a non-USB-expert it's hard to interprete such "bogus" lines in your logs.
> I am curious enough to ask which is fair :-).
> AFAICS in your eyes this is "harmless"?

If the device continues to work normally after the resume and none of
your programs are affected, then it is harmless.

Alan Stern





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux