On 8 February 2013 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday, February 08, 2013 01:47:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> [ 0.377473] [<ffffffff8105a5ef>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 >> >> [ 0.377479] [<ffffffff81579130>] ? acpi_cpufreq_target+0x2c0/0x2c0 >> >> [ 0.377483] [<ffffffff8105a64a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 >> >> [ 0.377487] [<ffffffff810bb7e6>] smp_call_function_single+0x146/0x190 >> >> [ 0.377492] [<ffffffff81579130>] ? acpi_cpufreq_target+0x2c0/0x2c0 >> >> [ 0.377496] [<ffffffff810bb881>] smp_call_function_any+0x51/0x100 >> >> [ 0.377500] [<ffffffff815788c9>] get_cur_val+0x99/0x130 >> >> [ 0.377504] [<ffffffff81579444>] ? acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x2b4/0x6a0 >> >> [ 0.377508] [<ffffffff81578db0>] get_cur_freq_on_cpu+0x60/0x80 >> >> [ 0.377512] [<ffffffff815795a2>] acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x412/0x6a0 >> >> [ 0.377517] [<ffffffff81575bb9>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x2d9/0x4f0 > This problem was introduced by some cpufreq changes that have been dropped from > linux-next for now (they are still present in the one you're testing, though). I know why you got this crash and a pull from following would certainly fix it :) http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-rafael
