Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013, 21:44:41 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > On 01/13/2013 09:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > 0001: Refreshed 1-2 as v3 against Linux v3.8-rc3. > > 0002: v2 of 2-2 applied cleanly after 1-2 was refreshed! > > Hi Sedat, > > for the moment, you should use only the 1/2 because 2/2 (which is an > optimization) is wrong. Hi Daniel, thanks again for this patch, this together with my patch finally fix the bug. Now I recognized that only my patch was also sent to stable (thanks Rafael), yours not. So the bug is not completely fixed in 3.4 and 3.7. Is there a reason for not sending this to stable, too? Kind regards, Thomas
