Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN tty-next on suspend ]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130117:
>
> Undropped tree: samung
>
> The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
>
> The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
> fix patch.
>
> The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20130117.
>
> The samsung tree lost the majority of its conflicts but gained more
> against the arm-soc and slave-dma tree.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

[ TO TTY folks ] + [ CC Rafael and linux-pm ML ]

In the end it turned out to be a problem with tty-next (see thread in [1]).
I am hitting the problem reproducibly on PM/suspend.
Rafael gave me some cool help on pm-testing, thanks (see also thread in [1])

Ilya has sent a patch to [3] which needs to be refreshed.
AFAICS also be adapted to the recent changes to tty_port and tty_buf.
But hey, I am no TTY expert so it is up to you.

Hope you will CC me on the patch.

Thanks!

- Sedat -

[1] http://marc.info/?t=135854714000003&r=1&w=2
[2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tty-next
[3] http://marc.info/?t=135452868300003&r=1&w=2


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux