Re: use of pm_runtime_disable() from driver probe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 7 Jul 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > What is the right way to handle the runtime PM enable/disable in a
> > failed probe attempt?
> 
> I would recommend using pm_runtime_disable() and then either
> pm_runtime_set_active() or pm_runtime_set_suspended() depending on what the
> real power state of the device is at this point.
> 
> Anyway, you can't force the device into a low-power state using runtime PM
> after a failing probe, at least in general.

Right.  About the best you could do would be to call the appropriate 
runtime_suspend method directly, instead of going through the runtime 
PM core.  However, if the probe is failing then there's no reason to 
think the runtime_suspend method will work.

Basically, on the platform bus, if you don't have a driver for a device 
(which you don't, if the probe routine fails) then you can't do runtime 
PM on it.

But what if the device belongs to a PM domain?  Putting the entire
domain back into a low-power state might have the desired effect -- but
the probe routine wouldn't be able to do this.  The platform subsystem
would have to take care of it somehow.

Alan Stern



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux