On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle > >> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the > >> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately > >> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi. > >> > >> This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the > >> notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of > >> encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported > >> functions. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This one looks good to me too. > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Thanks for the review Rafael. > > > Len, are you going to take it? > > Rafael, Len, > > After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at: > > ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git > #cpuidle-next > > I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the > last minutes conflict when Len will apply them. > > I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing. I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this. Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there be any conflicts in linux-next? Rafael
