On 06/18/2012 08:15 PM, Colin Cross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I propose to host a cpuidle-next tree where all these modifications will >> be and where people can send patches against, preventing last minutes >> conflicts and perhaps Lenb will agree to pull from this tree. In the >> meantime, the tree will be part of the linux-next, the patches will be >> more widely tested and could be fixed earlier. > > My coupled cpuidle patches were acked and temporarily in Len's > next/Linus pull branch, but were later dropped when the first pull > request to Linus was rejected. I asked Len to either put the coupled > cpuidle patches into his next branch, or let me host them so people > could base SoC branches off of them and let Len pull them later, but > got no response. If you do start a cpuidle for-next branch, can you > pull my coupled-cpuidle branch: No problem. Thanks -- Daniel > The following changes since commit 76e10d158efb6d4516018846f60c2ab5501900bc: > > Linux 3.4 (2012-05-20 15:29:13 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common.git coupled-cpuidle > > Colin Cross (4): > cpuidle: refactor out cpuidle_enter_state > cpuidle: fix error handling in __cpuidle_register_device > cpuidle: add support for states that affect multiple cpus > cpuidle: coupled: add parallel barrier function > > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig | 3 + > drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c | 715 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 68 ++++- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 32 ++ > include/linux/cpuidle.h | 11 + > 6 files changed, 813 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
