Re: [PATCH] ACPI, cpuidle: Fix suspend/resume regression caused by cpuidle cleanup.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, June 13, 2012, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> 
> From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Fix suspend/resume regression caused by cpuidle cleanup.
> 
> Commit e978aa7d7d57d04eb5f88a7507c4fb98577def77 ( cpuidle: Move
> dev->last_residency update to driver enter routine; remove dev->last_state)
> was  breaking suspend on laptops, as reported in the below link
> 	- https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/164
> 
> This was fixed in commit 3439a8da16bcad6b0982ece938c9f8299bb53584
> (ACPI / cpuidle: Remove acpi_idle_suspend (to fix suspend regression)
> by removing acpi_idle_suspend flag.
> 	- https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/14/74
> 
> But this fix did not work on all systems
> as Suspend/resume regression was reported on Lenovo S10-3
> recently by Dave.
> 	- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/27/115
> It looked like with commit e978aa7d broke suspend and
> with commit 3439a8da resume was not working with acpi_idle driver.
> 
> This patch fixes the regression that caused this issue
> in the first place. acpi_idle_suspend flag is essential on
> some x86 systems to prevent the cpus from going to deeper C-states
> when suspend is triggered ( commit b04e7bdb984 )
> So reverting the commit 3439a8da is essential.
> 
> By default, irqs are disabled in cpu_idle arch specific call
> and re-enabled in idle state return path . As the acpi_idle_suspend
> flag was being set during suspend, which prevented the cpus
> going to deeper idle states, it is essential to
> enabling the irqs in its return path too.
> 
> To address the suspend issue,
> we were not re-enabling the interrupts while returning from
> acpi_idle_enter_bm() routine if acpi_idle_suspend flag is set.
> and this was causing suspend failure.
> 
> In addition to the above fix, a sanity check has also been added
> in x86 arch specific cpu_idle call to ensure that the idle call
> always returns with IRQs enabled.
> 
> This patch applies on 3.5-rc2
> ---
> 
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Dav Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Preeti Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This appears to be an urgent regression fix.

Is anyone going to take it, or should I do that?

Rafael


> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c     |    6 ++++++
>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 735279e..8ab76ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,12 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>  				pm_idle();
> 
>  			rcu_idle_exit();
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Sanity check to ensure that idle call returns
> +			 * with IRQs enabled
> +			 */
> +			WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
>  			start_critical_timings();
> 
>  			/* In many cases the interrupt that ended idle
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index f3decb3..c2ffd84 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static void lapic_timer_state_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>  /*
>   * Suspend / resume control
>   */
> +static int acpi_idle_suspend;
>  static u32 saved_bm_rld;
> 
>  static void acpi_idle_bm_rld_save(void)
> @@ -242,13 +243,21 @@ static void acpi_idle_bm_rld_restore(void)
> 
>  int acpi_processor_suspend(struct acpi_device * device, pm_message_t state)
>  {
> +	if (acpi_idle_suspend == 1)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	acpi_idle_bm_rld_save();
> +	acpi_idle_suspend = 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
>  int acpi_processor_resume(struct acpi_device * device)
>  {
> +	if (acpi_idle_suspend == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	acpi_idle_bm_rld_restore();
> +	acpi_idle_suspend = 0;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> @@ -754,6 +763,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> 
>  	local_irq_disable();
> 
> +	if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> +		local_irq_enable();
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	lapic_timer_state_broadcast(pr, cx, 1);
>  	kt1 = ktime_get_real();
>  	acpi_idle_do_entry(cx);
> @@ -823,6 +838,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> 
>  	local_irq_disable();
> 
> +	if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> +		local_irq_enable();
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (cx->entry_method != ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
>  		current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
>  		/*
> @@ -901,6 +922,13 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	if (unlikely(!pr))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> +	if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
> +		if (irqs_disabled())
> +			local_irq_enable();
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!cx->bm_sts_skip && acpi_idle_bm_check()) {
>  		if (drv->safe_state_index >= 0) {
>  			return drv->states[drv->safe_state_index].enter(dev,
> 
> Regards,
> Deepthi
> 
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux