On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote: > This patch exposes the definitions under control.h to > drivers outside the machine code. > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> > --- After second thought, this complete header movement needs to avoided. Drivers should not anyway include something like <mach/control.h> May be split the control.h header file data into .. - defines used by mach-omap2/* files which can remain in "control.h" in existing location. - common functions/defines used across drivers/*, mach-omap2/*, plat-omap/*, should go to include/linux/omap_control.h - Driver specific defines like thermal, usb etc, should go to respective drivers file. What do you think ? Regards santosh _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
