On Sunday, May 27, 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2012, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:06:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Andrey, Stephen, > > > > > > > > > > We still have problems with this patch in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278 > > > > > so some more testing will be necessary, I'm afraid. > > > > > > > > > > I will send a series of ACPI and PCI patches I have collected so far, > > > > > that I'd like you to test on top of kernel 3.4.0 with commit > > > > > 151b61284776 reverted. > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if suspend/wakeup work for you with these patches applied. > > > > I get the usual freeze on suspending with these patches. > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > Please try to unapply [4/4] and see if that helps. > > It helps. > > Trying to follow the ACPI spec too closely may be a bad idea. We > should try to copy what Windows does (whatever that is!). Well, that's why I made it a separate patch, among other things. :-) So, do you think we should apply [1/4] and [2/4] and try to work around the BIOS bug from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278 (I suppose we can do that by double checking if the target state returned by ACPI is in agreement with the capabilities returned by the PCI layer)? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
