On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:54:58AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > From the description of the change this is necessary because the > capacity units may change over time? Can we not use those to avoid this > update? I presume it is these two we are referring to? > > int capacity_granularity_1; > int capacity_granularity_2; power_unit rather than capacity_granularity, but the idea seems solid. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
