On 04/02/2012 03:21 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 04/02/2012 06:18 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The usual cpuidle initialization routines are to register the
driver, then register a cpuidle device per cpu.
With the device's state count default initialization with the
driver's state count, the code initialization remains mostly the
same in the different drivers.
We can then add a new function 'cpuidle_register' where we register
the driver and the devices. These devices can be defined in a global
static variable in cpuidle.c. We will be able to factor out and
remove a lot of duplicate lines of code.
As we still have some drivers, with different initialization routines,
we keep 'cpuidle_register_driver' and 'cpuidle_register_device' as low
level initialization routines to do some specific operations on the
cpuidle devices.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
+/*
+ * cpuidle_register : register cpuidle driver and devices
+ * Note this function must be called after smp_init.
+ * @drv : the cpuidle driver
+ * Returns 0 on success,< 0 otherwise
+ */
+int cpuidle_register(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
+{
+ int ret, cpu, i;
+ struct cpuidle_device *dev;
+
+ ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ dev =&per_cpu(cpuidle_device, cpu);
+ dev->cpu = cpu;
+
+ ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unregister;
+ }
+
+out:
+ return ret;
+
+out_unregister:
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ if (i == cpu)
+ break;
+ dev =&per_cpu(cpuidle_device, cpu);
^^^
That must have been "i" instead of "cpu"...
Oops, right ! Good catch.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
