From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> we check that the address is non-zero later anyway. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11533 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c | 3 +-- drivers/acpi/reboot.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c index 9d38eb6..fe1fb63 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c @@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_reset(void) /* Check if the reset register is supported */ - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER) || - !reset_reg->address) { + if (!reset_reg->address) { return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST); } diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c index a6c77e8b..c1d6124 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ void acpi_reboot(void) /* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be * checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores * these fields */ - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER)) - return; + /* Ignore also acpi_gbl_FADT.flags.ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER */ reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value; -- 1.7.10.rc2.19.gfae9d _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
