On Sunday, March 25, 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, NeilBrown wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Your recent patch: > > commit 35cd133c > > PM: Run the driver callback directly if the subsystem one is not there > > > > breaks suspend for my libertas wifi and probably other SDIO devices. > > > > SDIO (and possible MMC in general) has a protocol where the suspend > > method can return -ENOSYS and this means "There is no point in suspending, > > just turn me off". > > > > The device itself "mmc1:0001" (I think) doesn't have any bus etc 'suspend' > > function so the new code call the device's suspend function which returns > > ENOSYS and the suspend fails. > > > > The previous code ignores the device as there is no bus suspend, and when it > > gets to suspend the ancestor - which for me is omap_hsmmc.1, it calls the > > device suspend function catches the ENOSYS, and turns it off. > > > > I suspect just reverting it isn't the right long term solution, however I > > can confirm that it works for me for now. > > > > I'm happy to try any alternate fixes you would like to suggest (but I cannot > > promise how quickly I will get the testing done). > > With a little restructuring, this might be a good application for > pm_runtime_no_callbacks(). That won't cover system suspend, though. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm