Re: [PATCH V3] cpuidle: Add a sysfs entry to disable specific C state for debug purpose.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:55:00AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:29 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:29 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:39:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Do you know of any tools using these files?  I have never heard of them,
> > > > > > and I was told we should move these files years ago.  So I don't think
> > > > > > there should be any api issues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > powertop uses them.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, then we can't move them all.
> > > > 
> > > > We should then just move the ones that have multiple lines, as I'm
> > > > pretty sure powertop doesn't use them, right?
> > > All sys files under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle have single line. If we move
> > > some files to debugfs and keep others under sysfs, users might be confused.
> > > 
> > > Should we go back to the 1st version which just adds the new entry to
> > > sysfs?
> > 
> > Wait, I thought this whole thing started when we wanted to move the
> > files that had multiple lines out of sysfs?
> No. Liu Shuo's patch adds a new entry under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle and users
> can disable specific C state.
> A gentleman raised that if we should move it to debugfs, then you suggested
> to move all files under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle to debugfs.
> 
> > 
> > If none of these do, and they all are being used by tools already, then
> > fine, they should stay.
> Agree.
> 
> > 
> > But for some reason, I thought there was a problem here.  Perhaps that
> > was in the cpufreq code?
> I checked cpufreq quickly. Every file has single-line, but some have
> multiple-fields.
> 
> We would send a new patch based on sysfs as the new entry has
> single line.

Then that's fine, I'm very sorry for getting this wrong the first time
and causing you extra work.  I owe you all the drink of your choice the
next time I see you.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux