Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: CPU frequency max as PM QoS param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@xxxxxx> writes:
> Re-adding cpufreq and linux-pm MLs in Cc.
>
> Regards,
> Jean

Thanks Jean. And sorry for causing the lists to get dropped.

Does anyone have comments about the user space interface for per device
constraints:

>>>>>> Another complication for the per device constraints is the user space
>>>>>> interface. Dynamic minors run out pretty fast if we have per CPU
>>>>>> parameters and the system has huge number of CPUs. Does anyone have any
>>>>>> opinions about the user space interface for device PM QoS?

My current view is that CPU frequency constraints could be global just
like the CPU latency constraints are.

	--Antti
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux