"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > Well, while it might be easier, the _whole_ _point_ of governors is to make > decisions on the basis of available data. By introducing an independent > mechanism for that we're bypassing governors in a sense. I see this as modular design: governor defines the overall CPU frequency control policy and PM QoS defines constraints. I think those things can and probably should be somewhat independent. --Antti _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
