Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] RFC: CPU frequency min/max as PM QoS params

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Would it be possible for you to split this set up where you only have
> the cpu_min_freq enabling in pos.c and cpufreq and make the rest of the
> set a separate patch set?

Would that be patches 1-5 vs the rest?

> As you have it currently the parts I care about are intermixed with
> controversial things (max freq and the new cpufreq exports).

I think the cpufreq changes, patches 3-5, are necessary. Well, patch 3
is not necessary for functionality but would be helpful for
debugging/diagnosis and IMHO makes sense as a companion to patch 4. The
max freq is in patches 7 and 8.

> Also could you make the entire set git am friendly?  Only the first
> patch am's the reset don't.

Could you help me reproduce the problem? For me the mails apply fine.
Also a colleague tested them and encountered no problems. When I know
how to fix the set I'll post a split version.

	--Antti

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux