On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:29:26PM +0200, Antti P Miettinen wrote: > [seems that posting via gmane is broken - resenting manually via mail > - sorry if you get duplicates] > > mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Why do you need to export these values here and from the pmqos ABI? > > > > I don't think we want this change. Also, isn't it redundant WRT > > existing CPU freq govoner sysfs output? > > > > --mark > > Hmm.. what do you mean by pmqos ABI? This is related to patch 4. Nothing > critical, just an addition to be able to see the user_policy min/max in > addition to the policy min/max. It's not redundant, it's an > addition. Might be useful for e.g. tests. Maybe I'm missing something but cpufreq already has ABI for setting upper and lower bounds for frequencies. /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/[scaling_min_freq, scaling_max_freq] --mark _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
