Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Implement the devices wake-up latency constraints using the global
>>> device PM QoS notification handler which applies the constraints to the
>>> underlying layer by calling the corresponding function at hwmod level.
>>>
>>> Tested on OMAP3 Beagleboard and OMAP4 Pandaboard in RET/OFF using wake-up
>>> latency constraints on MPU, CORE and PER.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx>
> ...
>
>>> +/* Interface to the per-device PM QoS framework */
>>> +static int omap2_dev_pm_qos_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>> + unsigned long new_value,
>>> + void *req)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_device *od;
>>> + struct omap_hwmod *oh;
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>>> + struct dev_pm_qos_request *dev_pm_qos_req = req;
>>> +
>>> + pr_debug("OMAP PM CONSTRAINTS: req@0x%p, new_value=%lu\n",
>>
>> s/CONSTRAINTS/constraints/
>> another one below.
> Ok
>
>>
>>> + req, new_value);
>>> +
>>> + /* Look for the platform device for the constraint target device */
>>> + pdev = to_platform_device(dev_pm_qos_req->dev);
>>> +
>>> + /* Try to catch non platform devices */
>>
>> why?
> The constraints targets are the power domains, which you find by
> walking through the chain of structs dev, pdev, omap_device, hwmod and
> finally pwrdm.
OK
>>
>>> + if (pdev->name == NULL) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: Error: platform device for device %s not valid\n",
>>> + __func__, dev_name(dev_pm_qos_req->dev));
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Find the associated omap_device for dev */
>>> + od = container_of(pdev, struct omap_device, pdev);
>>
>> What about devices that are valid platform_devices, but not omap_devices?
> Do you mean that od should be tested for NULL value?
First, it should be using the to_omap_device() helper function from
omap_device.h.
Until v3.2, it was based on container_of() so checking for NULL will not
help. However, as of v3.2, because I decoupled platform_device and
omap_device, checking for a NULL return from to_omap_device() will be a
good enough check.
Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
