On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > >> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx> >> >> The MPU latency figures for cpuidle include the MPU itself and also >> the peripherals needed for the MPU to execute instructions (e.g. >> main memory, caches, IRQ controller, MMU etc). On OMAP3 those >> peripherals belong to the MPU and CORE power domains and so the >> cpuidle C-states are a combination of MPU and CORE states. >> >> This patch implements the relation between the cpuidle and per- >> device PM QoS frameworks in the OMAP3 specific idle callbacks. >> >> The chosen C-state shall satisfy the following conditions: >> . the 'valid' field is enabled, >> . it satisfies the enable_off_mode flag, > > Not directly related to this patch, but is there any reason to keep the > 'enable_off_mode' flag after this series? enable_off_mode could be removed completely after this series unless there is a need to prevent OFF mode for debug reasons. > > Kevin > Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
