[PATCH 3/6][resend] acpi : remove 'latency_ticks' in acpi_processor_cx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The latency_ticks field is used to store a value but it is never
used. It is safe to remove it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    2 --
 include/acpi/processor.h      |    1 -
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 24fe3af..dd87355 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -595,7 +595,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_power_verify_c3(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 	 */
 	cx->valid = 1;
 
-	cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency;
 	/*
 	 * On older chipsets, BM_RLD needs to be set
 	 * in order for Bus Master activity to wake the
@@ -628,7 +627,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 			if (!cx->address)
 				break;
 			cx->valid = 1; 
-			cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency; /* Normalize latency */
 			break;
 
 		case ACPI_STATE_C3:
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index 610f6fb..1b6e65c 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_cx {
 	u8 entry_method;
 	u8 index;
 	u32 latency;
-	u32 latency_ticks;
 	u32 power;
 	u32 usage;
 	u64 time;
-- 
1.7.4.1

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux