Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2011, 14:30:52 schrieb Anton Vorontsov: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 02:05:06PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:56 +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Userspace programs like upower seem to depend on the presence of the > > > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT property. > > > > > > The real presence of the battery cannot be sensed and all other > > > routines of s3c-adc-battery simply expect it to be present. > > > > > > Therefore we simply return 1, unless the battery struct is not present > > > at all. > > > > Looks OK for me, > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@xxxxxxxxx> > > I disagree. If the driver behaves like the hardware does not support > hot-pluggable cells, then present property is not necessary. > > Upowerd should look at the 'present' only if it is there; and if it > is not, cells assumed to be always present. [..] > So, the problem is in upowerd, not this driver. Thanks for your comment. I will therefore take this matter up with the upower- guys. Thanks Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
