On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> We are trying to produce >> a runtime PM system of product quality based on 3.0.y and we've >> already had to backport this patch ourselves to get things stable. >> >> We have also backported: >> PM: Introduce generic "noirq" callback routines for subsystems (v2) >> PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep >> PM / Runtime: Add new helper function: pm_runtime_status_suspended() >> >> And now it seems to be sufficient to get this thing going. > > Well, it isn't a simple fix and it changes the code's behavior quite > significantly, so I thought it might not be a good idea to risk problems > with -stable because of it. Perhaps let's see how it works out in 3.1 > and backport it later if there are no problem reports related to it? OK no hurries, let's give it a spin in 3.1 for some weeks or so. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
