Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Since sci_port_enable() and sci_port_disable() may be run with
> > > interrupts off and they execute pm_runtime_get_sync() and
> > > pm_runtime_put_sync(), respectively, the SCI device's
> > > power.irq_safe flags has to be used to indicate that it is safe
> > > to execute runtime PM callbacks for this device with interrupts off.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Not sure how you want this one handled. Did you simply want to roll this
> > in with your other patch with my Acked-by, or should I be taking this
> > through my tree already regardless of the 1/2 patch?
> 
> I'd prefer to push it through my tree, if you don't mind.  Magnus has
> already acked it for me, hopefully that's OK?
> 
Sure, sounds fine to me. I'll just ignore it then.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux