On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, August 24, 2011, Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Since sci_port_enable() and sci_port_disable() may be run with > > > interrupts off and they execute pm_runtime_get_sync() and > > > pm_runtime_put_sync(), respectively, the SCI device's > > > power.irq_safe flags has to be used to indicate that it is safe > > > to execute runtime PM callbacks for this device with interrupts off. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > Not sure how you want this one handled. Did you simply want to roll this > > in with your other patch with my Acked-by, or should I be taking this > > through my tree already regardless of the 1/2 patch? > > I'd prefer to push it through my tree, if you don't mind. Magnus has > already acked it for me, hopefully that's OK? > Sure, sounds fine to me. I'll just ignore it then. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
