Re: [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, August 21, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:14:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > I guess you mean the driver here and I'm not really sure it can.
> > For instance, the driver may not know what configuration it works in,
> > e.g. is there a power domain or a hierarchy of those and how much time
> > it takes to power them all down and up and what the power break even is.
> 
> I don't understand why the driver would need to know what situation it's
> in.  I'd been working on the basis that the idea was that the driver
> said what the constraints it has are and then some code with a more
> system wide view would make the actual decisions for things outside the
> driver domian.

That's correct, but in order to figure out a "sensible default"
the driver generally would need to know what the expectations with
respect to it are.  Otherwise it can very well generate a random
number and use that.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux