On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 16 August 2011 07:13 PM, jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> >> >> This patch adds wake up latency numbers for OMAP4. Note that these are >> preliminary numbers and need to be relooked. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> >> >> The INACTIVE state is added as unsupported. >> > In that case, don't add that support in first place. When INA support is > getting added, you can update these as well. No. A value is needed for all states, even if unsupported at the moment. Omitting a value causes it to be set to '0', which means 'no latency'. Jean _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
