On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:47:47PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "On the hardware that shipped we enter the same power state from idle > > > and suspend, so the only power savings we get from suspend that we > > > don't get in idle is from not respecting the scheduler and timers." > > This is no longer the case. Both the Nexus-S and Xoom enter lower > > power states from suspend than idle. > Just out of curiosity, is that due to some kind of hardware limitation on > those platforms, or is it because the software infrastructure for dynamic > deep idle hasn't been fully implemented in that subarchitecture code? At least the Nexus S doesn't implmeent any of the deep idle infrastructure. However, I'd expect that you can achieve some power saving from entering system suspend as if *everything* is off then the PMIC can be suspended which can enable additional power savings. Unless I'm missing something that'd be hard to hit with cpuidle only stuff. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
