pm_runtime_suspended() can be false if RPM_SUSPENDED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

Just curious why pm_runtime_suspended() requires the device to be
enabled for it to return true:

static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended(struct device *dev)
{
	return dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDED
		&& !dev->power.disable_depth;
}

I must be misunderstanding something, but I would consider a device that
has been runtime suspended before runtime PM was disabled to still be
runtime suspended.

I just noticed this when testing with your pm-domains branch.  when I
noticed that an 'if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))' check in my PM domain's
->suspend_noirq() was always failing since it's after the PM core calls
pm_runtime_disable().  I had to change my PM domain code to only check
dev->power.runtime_status for it to work.

Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux