On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Another curiosity is that, contrary to the above documentation, there is > no usage_count increment before the bus/driver ->remove() (although > there is a _get_sync/_put_sync around the sysfs_remove and notifier just > before the bus/driver->remove(). I hadn't noticed that. There may be a reason for using get_sync instead of get_noresume, but it isn't explained anywhere. And it certainly looks like a mistake for the put_sync to occur before the ->remove() call instead of after. This needs to be fixed. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
