On 06/17/2011 10:02 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:00 +0530, Trinabh Gupta wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> index 39a2baa..932392b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,24 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void do_nothing(void *unused)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs come out of the old
>> + * idle loop and start using the new idle loop.
>> + * Required while changing idle handler on SMP systems.
>> + * Caller must have changed idle handler to the new value before the call.
>> + */
>> +void cpu_idle_wait(void)
>> +{
>> + smp_mb();
>> + /* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of old idle routine */
>> + smp_call_function(do_nothing, NULL, 1);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
>> +
>> int powersave_nap;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>
> This is gross :-)
Well this is what exists today for x86; so didn't think too
much into this. Maybe there is cleaner way. The requirement
is to completely exit the idle loop and call cpuidle_idle_call()
again. I think sending reschedule may be enough.
With respect to current implementation the arch-independent cpuidle
code needs a cpu_idle_wait() function for any architecture where
CONFIG_SMP is defined. This cpu_idle_wait function is called
whenever we have to pause usage of cpuidle; to switch driver
or governor etc. So maybe there is a cleaner implementation of
cpu_idle_wait instead of smp_call_function(do_nothing...); sending
reschedule may work.
Thanks
-Trinabh
>
> Do you need to absolutely ensure the idle task has changed or just
> kicking it with a send reschedule is enough ?
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
