On Monday, June 13, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 01:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >> On 06/12/2011 11:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >>>> On 06/12/2011 05:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thursday, June 09, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >>>>>> From: "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sounds stupid, but taking a glance at the time, and seeing the wrong time, or what seemed
> >>>>>> wrong in dmesg, caused me to go into total check the time clock panic mode.. So the patch below adds:
> >>>>>> "UTC" Coordinated Universal Time abreviation to the printk so people like me dont flip out over the time!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> before:
> >>>>>> [ 0.114915] Time: 1:47:03 Date: 06/09/11
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> after:
> >>>>>> [ 0.114728] Time: 5:46:02 UTC Date: 06/09/11
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suspect the goal is to mark messages printed by the PM trace code so that
> >>>>> they can be easily distinguished from messages from other sources to avoid
> >>>>> confusion. Why do you think it's a good idea to use the "UTC" string for
> >>>>> this purpose? The time printed in those messages need not be UTC.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It would be better to simply print "RTC time: ..., date: ..." IMO.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Rafael
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> well.. if thats better, then thats better.. over here(people that dont
> >>>> know what RTC time is) would not get so confused with a simple UTC or
> >>>> PDT or whatever the time zone is but if RTC is bettr, then its better.
> >>>
> >>> My point is we don't know this time is always UTC, so we rather shouldn't
> >>> label it as UTC unconditionally, should we?
> >>>
> >>> Rafael
> >>>
> >>
> >> sounds good to me!!
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean?
> >
>
> with what you are saying "RTC" if anything.. rather than "UTC"
So, it looks like you'd like the appended patch to be appiled?
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: PM: Add "RTC" to PM trace time stamps to avoid confusion
Some users are apparently confused by dmesg output from
read_magic_time(), which looks like "real" time and date.
Add the "RTC" string to time stamps printed by read_magic_time() to
avoid that confusion.
Reported-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/power/trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/trace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/trace.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/trace.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int read_magic_time(void
unsigned int val;
get_rtc_time(&time);
- pr_info("Time: %2d:%02d:%02d Date: %02d/%02d/%02d\n",
+ pr_info("RTC time: %2d:%02d:%02d, date: %02d/%02d/%02d\n",
time.tm_hour, time.tm_min, time.tm_sec,
time.tm_mon + 1, time.tm_mday, time.tm_year % 100);
val = time.tm_year; /* 100 years */
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
