Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] >> More specifically, what should be the approach in system suspend when a >> device is already runtime suspended? If you treat runtime and system PM >> as completely independent, you would have to runtime resume the device >> so that it can then be immediately system suspended. > > Assuming the wakeup setting is correct, and assuming you use the same > power level for runtime suspend and system suspend, then nothing needs > to be done. > > If the wakeup setting is not correct, it has to be changed. That > often implies going back to full power in order to change the > wakeup setting, then going to low power again. OK, but how should this be implemented? If the device is runtime suspended at system suspend time, it implies that somwhere in the system suspend path, the device has to be powered on and enabled (a.k.a. runtime resumed.) >From a driver writer's perspective, doing a pm_runtime_get_sync() would be the obvious choice, but that causes nesting of ->runtime_resume callbacks within ->suspend callbacks which is apparently forbidden (or rather strongly recommended against :) Now, assuming the driver's suspend can't do a pm_runtime_get()... In order to power on & enable the device, the driver has to essentially duplicate everything that would be done by a runtime resume. The problem comes because this work is shared between the driver and the subsystem. IOW, it's the driver's ->suspend() callback that decides whether or not the device needs to be powered-on/enabled (e.g. to enable/disable wakeups), but it might be the subsystem that actually has does the magic_device_set_full_power(), magic_device_enable(). So once the driver's ->suspend() realizes it needs to power on & enable the device, it has no way to tell the subsystem to do so, wait for it to happen, and then enable/disable its wakeups. Maybe I'm being really dense, really blind, or really stubborn (or all three), but it seems to be that using runtime PM calls to implement these things would be the most obvious and the most readable. Kevin _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
