On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > Well, this is a SHOULD, not a MUST. If you want your driver to leave a > > device in a low-power state, it can do so. Just bear in mind that the > > PM core's idea of the device's runtime power state may end up not > > matching reality unless you're careful. > > This is part of the trouble, it all feels like a lot more work than it > should be for relatively common cases. In the audio case we're fine as > the subsystem implements a completely independent PM infrastructure > which ignores the PM core except for system suspend (and sometimes > ignores that), it's noticably harder to reason about what's going on > when I go outside there and when I think about what I'm doing it always > feels like it should be possible to factor it out of the drivers. What would make the common cases easier? Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
