HI, Valdis, This patch is on top of reverted patch 81ca7e4. So you should not revert 81ca7e4 before applying this new one. Best regards, Jian On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 20 May 2011 10:02:56 PDT, Jian Peng said: > > --20cf307f38f6d842a904a3b81730 > > > You are both right that adding this majic 5ms delay at this place should not > > be the final solution. > > > > If this magic 5ms delay works on other affected systems, I plan to post a > > new patch that inside ahci_start_engine(), still perform same check, and > > show warning message if failed, but will set a flag, then still set START > > bit, and if there is such failure flag, add 5ms delay. > > > > Valdis, could you apply the following patch and retest it? > > I should be able to do that this weekend. To clarify - should this be with the > problem commit 270dac35c26433d06a89150c51e75ca0181ca7e4 applied, or reverted? > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
