Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk support code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 May 2011, Dave Martin wrote:

[ ... ]
+/*
+ * Save the current CPU state before suspend / poweroff.
+ */
+ENTRY(swsusp_arch_suspend)
+	ldr	r0, =__swsusp_arch_ctx
+	mrs	r1, cpsr
+	str	r1, [r0], #4		/* CPSR */
+ARM(	msr	cpsr_c, #SYSTEM_MODE					)
+THUMB(	mov	r2, #SYSTEM_MODE					)
+THUMB(	msr	cpsr_c, r2						)

For Thumb-2 kernels, you can use the cps instruction to change the CPU
mode:
	cps	#SYSTEM_MODE

For ARM though, this instruction is only supported for ARMv6 and above,
so it's best to keep the msr form for compatibility for that case.

Ah, ok, no problem will make that change, looks good.

Do all ARMs have cpsr / spsr as used here ? Or is that code restricted to ARMv5+ ? I don't have the CPU evolution history there, only got involved with ARM when armv6 already was out.

I've simply done there what the "setmode" macro from <asm/assembler.h> is doing, have chosen not to include that file because it overrides "push" on a global scale for no good reason and that sort of thing makes me cringe.



+	stm	r0!, {r4-r12,lr}	/* nonvolatile regs */

Since r12 is allowed to be corrupted across a function call, we
probably don't need to save it.

ah ok thx for clarification. Earlier iterations of the patch just saved r0-r14 there, "just to have it all", doing it right is best as always.


[ ... ]
+	bl	__save_processor_state

<aside>

Structurally, we seem to have:

swsusp_arch_suspend {
	/* save some processor state */
	__save_processor_state();

	swsusp_save();
}

Is __save_processor_state() intended to encapsulate all the CPU-model-
specific state saving?  Excuse my ignorance of previous conversations...

</aside>

You're right.

I've attached the codechanges which implement __save/__restore... for TI OMAP3 and Samsung S5P64xx, to illustrate, again (that's the stuff referred to in the earlier mail I mentioned in first post; beware of code churn in there, those diffs don't readily apply to 'just any' kernel).

These hooks are essentially the same as the machine-specific cpu_suspend() except that we substitute "r0" (the save context after the generic part) as target for where-to-save-the-state, and we make the funcs return instead of switching to OFF mode.

That's what I meant with "backdoorish". A better way would be to change the cpu_suspend interface so that it returns instead of directly switching to off mode / powering down.

Russell has lately been making changes in this area; the current kernels are a bit different here since the caller already supplies the state-save-buffer, while the older ones used to choose in some mach-specific way where to store that state.

(one of the reasons why these mach-dependent enablers aren't part of this patch suggestion ...)



+	pop	{lr}
+	b	swsusp_save
+ENDPROC(swsusp_arch_suspend)

I'm not too familiar with the suspend/resume stuff, so I may be asking
a dumb question here, but:

Where do we save/restore r8_FIQ..r13_FIQ, r13_IRQ, r13_UND and r13_ABT?
(I'm assuming there's no reason to save/restore r14 or SPSR for any
exception mode, since we presumably aren't going to suspend/resume
from inside an exception handler (?))

The exception stack pointers might conceivably be reinitialised to
sane values on resume, without necessarily needing to save/restore
them, providing my assumption in the previous paragraph is correct.

r8_FIQ..r12_FIQ can store arbitrary state used by the FIQ handler,
if FIQ is in use.  Can we expect any driver using FIQ to save/restore
this state itself, rather than doing it globally?  This may be
reasonable.

We don't need to save/restore those, because at the time the snapshot is taken interrupts are off and we cannot be in any trap handler either. On resume, the kernel that has been loaded has initialized them properly already.

If there's really any driver out there which uses FIQ in such an exclusive manner that it expects FIQ register bank contents to remain the same across multiple FIQ events then it's rather that driver's responsibility to perform the save/restore via suspend/resume callbacks.

See also Russell's mails about that, for previous attempts a year and half a year ago to get "something for ARM hibernation" in:

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-July/027571.html
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029665.html

The kernel doesn't do IRQ/FIQ/ABT/UND save / restore for suspend-to-ram either. CPU hotplug support (re)initializes those. I believe we're fine.



Cheers
---Dave



Thanks,
FrankH.
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/sleep.S b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/sleep.S
index 2cdae4a..dd9516b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/sleep.S
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/sleep.S
@@ -44,14 +44,32 @@
 */
 	.text
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+ENTRY(__save_processor_state)
+	mov	r1, #0
+	b	.Ls3c_cpu_save_internal
+ENDPROC(__save_processor_state)
+
+ENTRY(__restore_processor_state)
+	stmfd	sp!, { r3 - r12, lr }
+	ldr	r2, =.Ls3c_cpu_resume_internal
+	mov	r1, #1
+	str	sp, [r0, #40]		@ fixup sp in restore context
+	mov	pc, r2
+ENDPROC(__restore_processor_state)
+#endif
+
 	/* s3c_cpu_save
 	 *
 	 * entry:
 	 *	r0 = save address (virtual addr of s3c_sleep_save_phys)
-	*/
+	 *	r1 (_internal_ only) = CPU sleep trampoline (if any)
+	 */
 
 ENTRY(s3c_cpu_save)
 
+	ldr	r1, =pm_cpu_sleep	@ set trampoline
+.Ls3c_cpu_save_internal:
 	stmfd	sp!, { r3 - r12, lr }
 
 	mrc	p15, 0, r4, c13, c0, 0	@ FCSE/PID
@@ -67,11 +85,15 @@ ENTRY(s3c_cpu_save)
 
 	stmia	r0, { r3 - r13 }
 
+	mov	r4, r1
 	@@ write our state back to RAM
 	bl	s3c_pm_cb_flushcache
 
+	movs	r0, r4
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+	ldmeqfd	sp!, { r3 - r12, pc }	@ if there was no trampoline, return
+#endif
 	@@ jump to final code to send system to sleep
-	ldr	r0, =pm_cpu_sleep
 	@@ldr	pc, [ r0 ]
 	ldr	r0, [ r0 ]
 	mov	pc, r0
@@ -86,6 +108,7 @@ resume_with_mmu:
 	str	r12, [r4]
 
 	ldmfd	sp!, { r3 - r12, pc }
+ENDPROC(s3c_cpu_save)
 
 	.ltorg
 
@@ -131,6 +154,7 @@ ENTRY(s3c_cpu_resume)
 	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c7, c5, 0		@@ invalidate I Cache
 
 	ldr	r0, s3c_sleep_save_phys	@ address of restore block
+.Ls3c_cpu_resume_internal:
 	ldmia	r0, { r3 - r13 }
 
 	mcr	p15, 0, r4, c13, c0, 0	@ FCSE/PID
@@ -152,6 +176,11 @@ ENTRY(s3c_cpu_resume)
 	mcr	p15, 0, r12, c10, c2, 0	@ write PRRR
 	mcr	p15, 0, r3, c10, c2, 1	@ write NMRR
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+	cmp	r1, #0
+	bne	0f			@ only do MMU phys init
+					@ not called by __restore_processor_state
+#endif
 	/* calculate first section address into r8 */
 	mov	r4, r6
 	ldr	r5, =0x3fff
@@ -175,6 +204,7 @@ ENTRY(s3c_cpu_resume)
 	str	r10, [r4]
 
 	ldr	r2, =resume_with_mmu
+0:
 	mcr	p15, 0, r9, c1, c0, 0		@ turn on MMU, etc
 
         nop
@@ -183,6 +213,9 @@ ENTRY(s3c_cpu_resume)
         nop
         nop					@ second-to-last before mmu
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+	ldmnefd	sp!, { r3 - r12, pc }
+#endif
 	mov	pc, r2				@ go back to virtual address
 
 	.ltorg
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
index ea4e498..19ecd8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ logic_l1_restore:
 	ldr	r4, scratchpad_base
 	ldr	r3, [r4,#0xBC]
 	adds	r3, r3, #16
+.Llogic_l1_restore_internal:
 	ldmia	r3!, {r4-r6}
 	mov	sp, r4
 	msr	spsr_cxsf, r5
@@ -433,6 +434,10 @@ ttbr_error:
 	*/
 	b	ttbr_error
 usettbr0:
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+	cmp	r1, #1
+	ldmeqfd	sp!, { r0 - r12, pc }	@ early return from __restore_processor_state
+#endif
 	mrc	p15, 0, r2, c2, c0, 0
 	ldr	r5, ttbrbit_mask
 	and	r2, r5
@@ -471,6 +476,25 @@ usettbr0:
 	mcr	p15, 0, r4, c1, c0, 0
 
 	ldmfd	sp!, {r0-r12, pc}		@ restore regs and return
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+ENTRY(__save_processor_state)
+	stmfd	sp!, {r0-r12, lr}
+	mov	r1, #0x4
+	mov	r8, r0
+	b	l1_logic_lost
+ENDPROC(__save_processor_state)
+
+ENTRY(__restore_processor_state)
+	stmfd	sp!, { r0 - r12, lr }
+	str	sp, [r0]		@ fixup saved stack pointer
+	str	lr, [r0, #8]		@ fixup saved link register
+	mov	r3, r0
+	mov	r1, #1
+	b	.Llogic_l1_restore_internal
+ENDPROC(__restore_processor_state)
+#endif
+
 save_context_wfi:
 	/*b	save_context_wfi*/	@ enable to debug save code
 	mov	r8, r0 /* Store SDRAM address in r8 */
@@ -545,6 +569,10 @@ l1_logic_lost:
 	mrc	p15, 0, r4, c1, c0, 0
 	/* save control register */
 	stmia	r8!, {r4}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
+	cmp	r1, #4
+	ldmeqfd	sp!, {r0-r12, pc}	@ early return from __save_processor_state
+#endif
 clean_caches:
 	/* Clean Data or unified cache to POU*/
 	/* How to invalidate only L1 cache???? - #FIX_ME# */
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
index df5ce56..b4713ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ config ARCH_OMAP3
 	select CPU_V7
 	select COMMON_CLKDEV
 	select OMAP_IOMMU
+	select ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
 
 config ARCH_OMAP4
 	bool "TI OMAP4"
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux