On Friday, April 15, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:38:47 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > with 2.6.38, I enabled wakeup from suspend to RAM with the USB keyboard > > > > this way: > > > > > > > > echo USB2 > /proc/acpi/wakeup > > > > > > > > This does not work anymore with 2.6.39-rc3. Wakeup using the keyboard > > > > won't work, and the USB2 line in /proc/acpi/wakeup doesn't change to > > > > "enabled" after the echo command. > > > > > > > > Is this intended? If yes, what is the new way to enable keyboard > > > > wakeup? > > > > > > No, it's supposed to work IIRC. I'll have a look at that code tomorrow. > > > > Tino, can you check the contents of the power/wakeup files in the > > appropriate sysfs directories? That would be the directory for the > > keyboard device itself and the directory for the USB host controller > > for the bus the keyboard is on. > > > > By default, power/wakeup should be "enabled" for the keyboard device > > and "disabled" for the host controller. If you write "enabled" into > > the host controller's file by hand, does that fix the problem? > > I already tried to write "enable" into all USB related wakeup files > yesterday, not change. > > I'll check again how these files look like in 2.6.38, what sysfs > wakeup files change when writing into /proc/acpi/wakeup, and what > differences to 2.6.39-rc can be seen. Please post the contents of /proc/acpi/wakeup (without reverting the commits you have identified as "bad"). Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
