[Added linux-pm to the CC list.] On Wednesday, April 20, 2011, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: ... > Ah, now I see the problem. It looks like we did not give sufficient > thought to the case where a device starts off (and therefore should > finish up) in a powered-down state. Calling pm_runtime_put_sync() > after unbinding the device driver seems a little futile -- with no > driver, the subsystem may not be able to power-down the device! > > Rafael, how do you think we should handle this? Get rid of the > pm_runtime_get_no_resume() and pm_runtime_put_sync() calls in > dd.c:__device_release_driver()? I think we need pm_runtime_barrier() in there. Otherwise we risk removing the driver while there's a runtime PM request pending. But we can move the pm_runtime_put_sync() before driver_sysfs_remove(). Would that help? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
