On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:43:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> @@ -75,24 +69,7 @@ static int __init omap1_pm_runtime_init(
> if (!cpu_class_is_omap1())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - pm = platform_bus_get_pm_ops();
> - if (!pm) {
> - pr_err("%s: unable to get dev_pm_ops from platform_bus\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> - omap_pm = kmemdup(pm, sizeof(struct dev_pm_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!omap_pm) {
> - pr_err("%s: unable to alloc memory for new dev_pm_ops\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> - omap_pm->runtime_suspend = omap1_pm_runtime_suspend;
> - omap_pm->runtime_resume = omap1_pm_runtime_resume;
> -
> - platform_bus_set_pm_ops(omap_pm);
> + pm_runtim_clock_add_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_bus_notifier);
>
Presumably you meant pm_runtime_clock_add_notifier() here. You seem to
have the same typo in a few other places too.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
