On 04/06/11 03:45, Sonny Rao wrote: > Industrial I/O devices can sometimes take a long time to resume, > allowing them to be asynchronus saves 50ms on one light sensor > Hi Sonny, cc'd linux-iio I'm not particularly familiar with this. Are there any disadvantages? I just wonder if it would be better to push this into individual drivers rather than the core? Jonathan > Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c > index 768f448..a4b099f 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c > @@ -811,6 +811,8 @@ int iio_device_register(struct iio_dev *dev_info) > if (dev_info->modes & INDIO_RING_TRIGGERED) > iio_device_register_trigger_consumer(dev_info); > > + device_enable_async_suspend(&dev_info->dev); > + > return 0; > > error_free_sysfs: _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
