> 2.6.39-rc1 > ---------- > > x86 idle: deprecate floppy disable_hlt > feature-removal.txt for 2.6.40 (4 months) > WARN_ONCE on use > cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > x86 idle APM: deprecate apm_cpu_idle > feature-removal.txt for 2.6.40 (4 months) > #warning on CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE remove in 2.6.40 > WARN_ONCE in apm_cpu_idle() > cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > x86 idle: export pm_idle only for CONFIG_APM_MODULE > like we do for default_idle(), > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_idle) only on CONFIG_APM_MODULE > > x86 idle: deprecate "no-hlt" cmdline param > feature-removal.txt for 2.6.40 (4 months) > cc stable@xxxxxxxxxx > WARN_ONCE if used, ask if idle=poll is sufficient > same as idle=poll, except no-hlt also disables > HLT in machine_halt(). > > x86 idle: deprecate "idle=mwait" > feature-removal.txt for 2.6.40 (4 months) > cc stable@xxxxxxxxxx > WARN_ONCE on invocation > > x86 idle: re-name ce1_idle > rename for clarity, no functional change > > 2.6.40-merge > ------ > x86 idle: move mwait_idle_with_hints() > out of process.c to cstate.c, make static > > x86 idle floppy: remove deprecated disable_hlt/enable_hlt > > x86 idle: delete deprecated idle=mwait > default_idle() can use HLT > > cpuidle: add cmdline "cpuidle=off" > allow falling back to native default_idle > > x86 idle xen: stop touching pm_idle and default_idle > Xen Dom0 kernel only needs HLT, but include > CPU_IDLE, ACPI etc for running on bare hardware. > So when running in Xen Dom0 mode, disable cpuidle > to fall back to default_idle. > > x86 idle APM: remove deprecated apm_cpu_idle() > and its use of pm_idle > > x86 idle cpuidle: delete public use of pm_idle > make pm_idle and default_idle static to process.c Hi Len, I guess this would eliminate the problems caused by pm_idle. In that case I also think we need not implement a default driver (like the one I had done https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/22/154) to handle the case when acpi_idle and intel_idle may not register. Additionally, we may not need to support multiple cpuidle driver registration as now there would be only acpi_idle and intel_idle and mechanism already exists to select between the two. Thanks, -Trinabh > add return value from cpu_idle_call() > invoke cpu_idle_call from cpu_idle() rather than via pm_idle > > cpu_idle() { > ... > if (cpu_idle_call()) > pm_idle(); /* non cpuidle default */ > } > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm