On 03/28/2011 11:21 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> Or we phase out the APM effort by only supporting it for poweroff, for >> example. > > Phasing out APM idle at least would be reasonable. resumably even if the old > laptops still work they are likely on AC because their batteries have > long died. So using a bit more power in idle shouldn't be a big > issue. > > Not sure about suspend, screen saver etc. I suppose those could > be kept as frozen legacy features. At least until someone else > wants to redesign those parts too. > Since poweroff applies even to stationary systems, it's probably the most important bit. Suspend/resume the second most important. -hpa _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
